Avoid Being a “Botched” Victim When It Comes to Family Law Advice

Frustrated couple refusing to sign contact containing 'botched' family law advice

I do not know whether you have had the fortune, or misfortune as the case may be, to watch an episode of the reality TV show “Botched”. 

“Botched” follows the daily professional lives of 2 plastic surgeons in Beverly Hills who specialise in fixing up botched jobs done by less experienced and incompetent plastic surgeons.  In other words, all of their patients are former patients of other plastic surgeons and many are disfigured from procedures that have gone horribly wrong.  Hence the title of the reality show.

“Botched” reminds me of the family law practice of Bowen Buchbinder Vilensky (“BBV”).  Many of our clients have been the clients of sometimes, two or even three, other law firms before they eventually end up at BBV.  By the time these new clients come to our experienced and competent family law team, they are very often demoralised, low on funds and have completely lost faith in the legal system insofar as it relates to family law matters.

The lesson for potential clients seeking advice in family law is to avoid being a “Botched” victim.  That is, get good quality advice early in the process from experienced and competent family law lawyers who understand the process and will point you in the right direction from the outset.  This is a specialty of BBV.  The financial benefits of being in good hands early cannot be overestimated.

Put simply, start with the right family law lawyer to avoid having to change lawyers midstream to unwind bad legal or strategic advice provided by inexperienced lawyers.  Avoid wasting time and resources on bad legal advice.

As managing director, I could not be prouder of the family law team working at BBV.  I observe them at work every day.  They are ethical, experienced, passionate, empathetic and highly competent.  Further, they will work on a fixed fee basis so that clients know in advance what fees will be incurred. 

May I share with you a very recent testimonial provided by a satisfied client of the firm on whose behalf we concluded a rather complex family law matter:

            “You and your firm have been my saviour when it comes to sailing the treacherous waters of divorce, consent orders and paperwork. I cannot thank you enough for your advice, thoroughness and organisation. You were understanding, compassionate and have amazing patience.

Words cannot explain my feelings and I am forever thankful.”

If the producers of “Botched” were looking to do a similar series based on the legal profession, they could use the family law team at BBV as the practitioners fixing up the botched jobs caused by less experienced lawyers.

PLEASE CONTACT

If you would like advice in this area please contact David Vilensky at [email protected] 

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

What are the Duties of a Company Director?

Company Director fulfilling duties by signing documentation

Directors are responsible for the management and control of a Company.  They are the controlling minds of the Company.

Under common law principles the fiduciary duties of a director can be summarised as follows:

  • To act in good faith and for a proper purpose;
  • To exercise care, skill and diligence;
  • To exercise the powers for the purpose for which they were conferred; and
  • Avoid conflicts of interest.

In addition to the fiduciary duties owed by directors at common law as outlined above, the Corporations Act imposes extra statutory duties which to a large extent restate and reinforce the common law duties imposed on directors.  What is not widely known is the existence in our law of the so-called “business judgment rule” which is contained in section 180(2) of the Corporations Act.  The business judgment rule states, as a general rule, that if a director acts with care and diligence which is reasonably expected of a person with their knowledge and experience and if they act in good faith and for the benefit of the Company, then they will be exercising their duties and obligations to the Company correctly.

More to the point, a director of a Company will have met the requirements under the business judgment rule if they:

  • Make the particular business judgment in good faith and for a proper purpose;
  • Do not have a material personal interest in the subject matter of that judgment;
  • Inform themselves about the subject matter of the judgment to extent they reasonably believe to be appropriate; and
  • Rationally believe that the judgment is in the best interest of the Company.

While the purpose of the business judgment rule is to provide directors with an indemnity from personal liability for breaches of their statutory and general law duties of care and diligence, this defence will only apply if the decision making process is not flawed.  However, if a director departs from the principles of the business judgement rule, he or she will not have the protection afforded by the legislation and could be exposed to personal liability via litigation where it is alleged there has been a failure in the decision making process and the Company has suffered loss or damage as a result.

The potential ramifications that result from a director not meeting their obligations to their Company can be dire.  If the Company enters into a business transaction which sours or fails and the director did not conduct a proper and careful due diligence, that director may be held liable for damages sustained by the Company due to the imprudence of that director.

Caution should therefore always be exercised by a director of a Company before exercising their business judgment or embarking on a transaction which may affect the Company.

PLEASE CONTACT

If you would like advice in this area please contact David Vilensky at [email protected] or Alana Stallard  at [email protected] of our corporate advisory team.

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

The Importance of a Sole Director Having a Will

Companies that have a person registered as both the sole director and sole shareholder could be taking a big risk if the director dies without leaving a Will.

The company could have difficulty continuing to operate or it could be wound up.

Under the Corporations Act, if a single director of a company dies, the executor or personal representative appointed to administer the deceased’s estate may appoint a new director to the company having obtained a grant of Probate from the Supreme Court. The transitional director has all the powers, rights and duties of the deceased director and can keep the company functioning until shares are transferred to beneficiaries who may then appoint new directors. But if there is no valid will, a relative or other person would have to apply to the Supreme Court for letters of administration to manage the estate. This generally takes longer than an application for a grant of Probate.

While an option would be for the Public Trustee to be appointed to administer the estate, this procedure could take several months. A trading company in this situation would be unable to proceed with financial arrangements, might lose valuable work or incur penalties because it is unable to complete contracts.

It is therefore vitally important that a sole director who is also the sole shareholder of a company makes a valid Will. The Will can even nominate who the testator wishes his or her executor to appoint as a replacement director.

PLEASE CONTACT

Contact David Vilensky at [email protected] if you wish to discuss this matter or your estate planning objectives further.

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email